Spirituality Studies 10-2 Fall 2024 75 Kristína Dědová, Anna Sleziaková, Veronika Mihaliková Table 5 Testing Differences in Bystander Parameter Standard Bystander t p Cohen’s d M SD M SD Spirituality importance 4.32 2.04 4.06 1.96 −1.628 0.10 −0.13 Spirituality practice 3.13 2.14 2.89 1.99 −1.483 0.13 −0.12 Loneliness 17.65 5.54 18.72 5.80 2.344 0.019 0.19 Emotional loneliness 9.31 3.01 9.7 3.04 1.922 0.055 0.155 Social loneliness 8.34 3.05 8.95 3.24 2.38 0.018 0.19 3.4 Regression Analysis Based on the results of the correlation analysis, we decided to proceed to regression analysis, where we examined the overall experience of spirituality as a predictor for victims based on the role in bullying, and loneliness was tested as a predictor for all roles (victim, aggressor, defender, witness), based on the subscales of emotional and social loneliness. For the victim role, we examined the predictive power of the variables’ importance of spirituality, social and emotional loneliness. Given collinearity values that did not exceed 1.7, we proceeded to binomial logistic regression analysis. Overall, the model proved significant (p<0.001; N2R=0.09) and explained 9% of the variance. On deeper analysis of predictors, we did not show the importance of spirituality (p=0.166; z=1.38) as a significant predictor. With respect to experiencing loneliness, emotional loneliness was not found to be a significant predictor (p=0.147; z=-1.45) and social loneliness was found to be a significant predictor (p=0.002; z=-3.10), where an individual with lower levels of social loneliness is 0.873 times less likely to be a victim of bullying (OR=0.873).
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTUwMDU5Ng==