5 6 S p i r i t ua l i t y S t u d i e s 6 - 2 Fa l l 2 0 2 0 In Table 4, the Product-Moment Correlationof triguna and quantitative perception of prānic experiences were comput - ed. A significant negative correlation of sattva and electric sensation (-0.165, p≤ 0.01), a significant positive correlation between tamas and electric sensation (0.174, p ≤ 0.01) were found. There is no correlation between triguna and magnetic, tingling, ball-like experience and rotation. The association of ball experience and electric experience (0.167, p ≤ 0.01), ball experience and rotation experience (0.208, p ≤ 0.01), and rotation experience and electric experience (0.246, p ≤ 0.01) showed a significant positive correlation. A significant posi - tive correlation of tingling experience with ball experience (0.311, p≤ 0.01), and tingling experience with rotation (0.132, p≤ 0.05) was found. Apart from experience, sattva and rājas (-0.664, p≤ 0.01), sattva and tamas (-0.859, p≤ 0.01), and rājas with tamas (0.188, p≤ 0.01) also showed a significant correla - tion. Table 5 shows the Spearman’s Rank Correlationof triguna and qualitative perception of prānic experiences. There is no significant correlation between triguna and qualitative perception of prānic experiences. There is a positive correlation between temperature experience and light (0.125 p≤ 0.05), finger palm, and pulse experience (0.126, p≤ 0.05). Tab. 4. Pearson Product-Moment Correlation of Triguna and Prānic Experience Based on Quantitative Perception Sattva Rājas Tamas Magnetic Tingling Ball Electric Rotation Sattva 1 -.664 -.859 -.015 -.012 -.024 -.165** -.099 Rājas 1 -.188** .040 -.077 -.042 .062 .060 Tamas 1 -.008 .068 .060 .174** .089 Magnetic 1 -.027 .075 .099 .222** Tingling 1 .311** .111 .132* Ball 1 .167** .208** Electric 1 .246** Rotation 1 **Correlation is significant at.01 level * Correlation is significant at.05 level
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MzgxMzI=